There is an old adage about journalism that “a man who eats a chicken is no news, but a chicken who eats a man is”. The mechanisms by which journalists select issues are much better understood than the drivers of issue attention in legal scholarship. In a new article with Michal Ovadek and Monika Glavina, we try to contribute new insights by applying probabilistic topic-modelling to compare the contents of hundreds of thousands of EU legal acts, CJEU rulings and Common Market Law Review articles.
Monthly Archives: September 2021
The Gap Between the Law and What Legal Scholars Say About It: A Topic-Modelling Analysis
Comments Off on The Gap Between the Law and What Legal Scholars Say About It: A Topic-Modelling Analysis
Filed under Uncategorized
๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข-๐๐๐ฑ๐ฑ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ
Have you heard people saying that “hospitals have as many jabbed as non-jabbed patients” to suggest that vaccines are ineffective? Soon you may hear that there are “more vaccinated covid patients than unvaccinated ones in hospital wards”. What I’m seeing around me is that such misleading arguments can make smart folks otherwise confident in the power of science and modern medicine doubt the rationale for vaccination.
Let us be clear. What is wrong in this argument is not the statistics. But the conclusion anti-vaxxers pretend to draw. As with many things about the pandemic, you don’t need a degree in epidemiology to figure out why. All that is required is logic. The curve I’ve plotted here correctly shows that the proportion of vaccinated patients among people admitted to hospital for a covid infection should go up as the vaccination campaign progresses. You’ve read correctly: it should go UP, not down. I’ve drawn the curve assuming that non-vaccinated people are 9 times more likely to develop a form of the disease leading to hospitalisation, which is a good approximation of what we know about the efficacy of jabs authorised in Western countries (see analysis in Nature).
How can this be? The first thing to remember is that vaccinated and unvaccinated patients are drawn from changing populations. As more people get inoculated, the population of vaccinated people grows whereas the population of unvaccinated people shrinks. The other thing is that 90 per cent efficacy is not the same as 100 per cent efficacy. So, although the efficacy of the Pfizer/Biontech and Moderna jabs is very high, a more or less constant share of those who have been jabbed will catch the virus and end up in hospital care. As the inoculated population grows thanks to the progress of the vaccination campaign, this constant share represents a larger group in absolute terms (holding virus circulation and mitigating measures constant). Meanwhile, the unvaccinated population follows the same dynamic in reverse. Relative to the unvaccinated population, the share of people requiring hospital care is bigger, but this constant share applies to a population that gets smaller and smaller as more people get inoculated — thus moving them from unvaccinated to vaccinated status.
Counter-intuitive as it may first sound, the proportion of vaccinated people among covid patients will be lowest at the start and highest at the end of the vaccination campaign, when nearly everyone has been inoculated. But again, given what we know about vaccine efficacy, this is the conclusion that logic dictates. So don’t be fooled by anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists, use logic to debunk their flawed reasoning!
Comments Off on ๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข-๐๐๐ฑ๐ฑ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ
Filed under Uncategorized